01 August 2014 (17:11 UTC-07 Tango)/04 Shawwal 1435/10 Mordad 1393/06 Ren-Shen 4712
“OVERLORD has the capability to identify the serial number, receipt date, and location……when the database is properly maintained.”-DoD Inspector General, 18 June 2012
The U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) discovered the Department of Defense (DoD) has been using a gun registry system to document and track guns, called OVERLORD.
Barack Obama is the Commander in Chief of the DoD.
OVERLORD (Operational Verification of Reliable Logistics Oversight Database) is also used to document and track other items as well, anything with a serial number.
But don’t get too excited, the expensive system is proving to be a failure. Just days ago the SIGAR revealed that tens of thousands of guns transfered to the Afghan government have disappeared. The SIGAR investigation showed that OVERLORD was full of duplicate and fake serial numbers, as well as fake shipping documents.
In 2012, the DoD Inspector General (IG) found the same problem regarding the tracking of expensive night vision optics being used by Afghanistan military.
The IG also discovered that source funding for such operations, involving the U.S. military supply of Afghanistan forces, was being covered up: “…the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) uses pseudo-foreign military sales procedures to procure items and services to support the ANSF.”–Accountability of Night Vision Devices Procured for the Afghan National Security Forces Needs Improvement
Usually the word “pseudo” means “false”.
OVERLORD is a prime example of why no government system is fullproof: It’s created by humans, maintained by humans and thus corruptible. The IG calls this reality “internal control weakness”.
The 2012 IG report insinuates that individuals inside DSCA and U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Command (CECOM) are manipulating data so that OVERLORD is unable to properly track ‘sensitive’ items. In a politically correct way (as to not rock the boat) the IG simply said “controls” were not in place to make sure the correct data was being collated.
The same can be said for another DoD tracking database called SCIP (Security Cooperation Information Portal). SCIP is supposed to allow End Use Monitoring (EUM) of the foreign recipients of U.S. military equipment.
And there’s another tracking system targeting military contractors in Afghanistan, called Core Inventory Management System Enterprise Edition (CoreIMSEE).
If the DoD can’t keep track of their guns, then how can a Martial Law obsessed civilian government? As well, the DoD’s systems have proven to be manipulated by false data, so who’s to say a Martial Law loving regime won’t use such systems to False Flag frame anybody who speaks out against them?